I hear people say the same of the 55n but that's not my experience. The apo teles, 110n, 2.8/80n, 120a and 2.8/150a are a notch above the rest. The m645 lenses seem to fall into a couple of broad groups in terms of performance.
Mamiya tlr best bokeh lens full#
I have many m645 lenses but I only shoot them on full frame digital bodies, even in the last week for that matter, so I can't comment on edge or corner performance on the 645 film. If it isn't, what would be your recommendation?Īlthough I've owned an m6451000s for many years it's been even longer since I've used one. If it is as good as the 3.5 that will be my decision. So my question, finally, is: Does anyone have experience with this lens ? However, I've never read any review on the 150mm 2.8 ? It seems like it would be nice to have an extra stop. So back to the question, I've seen and read a lot of good things about the 150mm 3.5 I also don't want to mention the 80mm1.9 as I've already spent 1k on a lens this year. I have read on a thread they are all equally sharp, but im very nitpicky and I can't agree. Im looking for a lens that will ultimately retain detail all around when zoomed in I can work with any of those focal lengths really, as my main concern is quality and Seems to produce these hard starbursts around light sources which im not fond of I found the 45 and 150mm 3.5 most attractive and sharpest but the 45 I'm between the 45mm, 150mm 3.5, and 80mm 2.8.Īll night photo examples I've seen for those lenses seem great. Hobby wise, I shoot street night scenes and I plan on making this my "hobby" cameraĪs per usual, Im having a hard time choosing a lens I was just gifted a near mint Mamiya 1000s and im pretty eager to start shooting !
0 kommentar(er)
